- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 22:39:22 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
- cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Philip & Le Khanh <Philip-and-LeKhanh@royal-tunbridge-wells.org>, www-html@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
On 6 May, Jim Jewett wrote:
> If the parsing fallbacks were dropped, and b were defined strictly as
> a fallback for strong -- it would continue to be prescriptively wrong,
> but it would still produce something that many people would see as a
> synonym for header, just as they do in printed pages.
How do you read it out loud?
Doing it wrong in a different way doesn't mean that either way of
doing it wrong is a good idea.
Please - and it goes for all of us - try to keep in mind that
"graphical rendering of a page" is not the only physical reality in
which a webpage and its content is supposed to exist.
--
- Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies
tina@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net
+46 708 557 905
Received on Sunday, 6 May 2007 20:39:39 UTC