- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 10:02:52 -0500
- To: sunil vanmullem <sunil.vanmullem@btopenworld.com>
- CC: tina@greytower.net, www-html@w3.org
sunil vanmullem wrote: > Yes its important to recognise the importance of backward compatibility > and the accessibility legislation that gives certain communities the > ability to litigate. Though this shouldn't be allowed to act as a hindrance > to invention, innovation or the ability to progress. > Ignoring the implementation and litigation aspects of this issue for a moment... Tina was correct to indicate that without fallback content you ARE back to square one when working offline, or when the referenced resource is otherwise unavailable. It is important that content authors keep in mind their audience and where their content is expected to be used - not just XHTML 2 authors; all authors. Its not just an accessibility issue. There is also a specter of backward compatibility, but... XHTML 2 is not designed to be backward compatible, and there is really no expectation that something like "<div src="lala.html"> is going to mean anything outside of the context of an XHTML 2-compatible user agent. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Saturday, 31 March 2007 15:03:14 UTC