- From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 17:35:39 -0500
- To: www-html@w3.org
On 3/1/07, Yahia C. <cyahia@gmail.com> wrote: > > Barry <barry@polisource.com> wrote: > > There will be lots of abuse. The majority of web publishers might use > > emphasis for their title when there's nothing especially important about > > it. I don't think such emphasis should be rendered by the browser, but > > if it is, it's not a big deal. A bold title wouldn't bother me. > > Inability to make proper use of italics and some other things that were > > mentioned would bother me. > > What do you mean by "I don't think such emphasis should be rendered by the > browser" ? > Is the browser supposed to know if a text is really important or not? > In my opinion, there will be lots of abuse if the title of webpages turns > out to be using HTML. Just look at the actual SEO hacks or "optimizations." > > The bookmark title's styling is nice as a browser UI feature, but not that > important. > I also read some of you talking only about the desktop platform. What > about mobile devices? How should they handle overstyled title elements? > > I'm wondering why some start talking about headers in the <title>? I think > the most important things that lack the <title> tag are sub- and > superscript, and the abbreviation tags. Everything else shouldn't matter. I thought that was the point though. We're only talking about certain elements for annotation where that annotation is useful or required for understanding. There's certainly a use case for allowing sup, sub and abbr in titles. -- Orion Adrian
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2007 22:35:50 UTC