- From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:15:29 +0100
- To: "Orion Adrian" <orion.adrian@gmail.com>, www-html@w3.org
- Cc: help-whatwg.org@lists.whatwg.org
> There's nothing that prevents you from saying the content model of > title is limited to: > > sup, sub, em, strong, span, abbr (others I'm forgetting). Right, and that's basically what is proposed [1] (albeit not with a "comprehensive" content model yet). I understand that there's basic consensus on this issue, but the question is if that problem/inconsistency could be addressed in any future (X)HTML spec? (By the way, this somewhat tempts me to cross-post all the time.) [1] http://meiert.com/en/blog/20070226/html-semantics-of-title-element-content/ -- Jens Meiert http://meiert.com/en/
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2007 15:16:21 UTC