- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:35:01 +0000 (UTC)
- To: www-html@w3.org
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Tina Holmboe wrote: > > And I, and others, disagree. It's /not/ a solid basis. That is the topic > of this entire discussion. I would encourage you to raise your concerns on the public-html list. While the WHATWG is tracking this list (amongst many others) for feedback, and while the last two e-mails you sent have already been saved and will be taken into serious consideration for the WHATWG work at some future point, the W3C HTML working group is not using the www-html list for feedback and so currently your input is not being considered by the W3C. In particular, this decision is to be discussed at tomorrow's HTMLWG teleconference, which you are allowed to join if you go through the process for joining the working group before then. We will hopefully have a Web-based vote on the topic soon, so if you want to take part in this vote and have your input listened to, you should join the working group as soon as possible. The official instructions for joining are here: http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/40318/instructions I wrote some clearer instructions here: http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1173385976&count=1 The agenda for tomorrow's teleconference is here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Apr/1458.html Currently the group seems mostly in favour of using the WHATWG work -- I really would strongly encourage you and others to make your opinion known to the group very soon if you disagree with this. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 18:35:31 UTC