- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:49:59 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:36:31AM +1000, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > Can you actually write a MUST level requirement in that? Consider this a second vote for that idea. I can't think of any good reason to serve XHTML with a non-XML content-type. > XHTML 1.1 documents MUST be labelled with an XML Media Type such as > application/xml [RFC3023] or application/xhtml+xml [RFC3236] and MUST > NOT be labelled as text/html [RFC2854]. How does application/xhtml+xml fit with documents which: * Have XHTML's html element as the root element but use additional namespaces * Use XHTML elements but have the root element from another namespace RFC 3236 appears to be somewhat vague on the subject. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Monday, 2 April 2007 14:50:03 UTC