- From: Jonathan Worent <jworent@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
- To: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
- Cc: HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>, www-html-editor@w3.org
--- David Latapie <david@empyree.org> wrote: > > Le 25 sept. 06 à 15:00, Anne van Kesteren a écrit : > > > On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:54:30 +0200, David Latapie <david@empyree.org> > > wrote: > >> -- <em role="0"> default > >> -- <em role="+1"> equivalent to em > >> -- <em role="+2"> equivalent to strong > >> -- <em role="-1"> less important, may be rendered as font-size:smaller > > > > This proposal doesn't cover nesting. > > Do you mean emphasis inside an emphasis? I suggest *addition* That seems like it may be a bit complicated for browsers to implement. Why not just let the values speak for themselves. <em role="+1">This is some what emphasized. <em role="-2">This is fairly strongly de-emphasized<em role="+2">This is fairly strongly emphasized</em> Back to fairly strongly de-emphasized</em> Back to some what emphasized.</em> Granted this would not nor should not be considered good practice, but i think that's how nesting should be handled __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 05:39:07 UTC