- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:04:04 +0900
- To: Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, WHATWG List <whatwg@whatwg.org>, W3C HTML <www-html@w3.org>
Le 30 oct. 2006 à 08:32, Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells a écrit : > Henri Sivonen wrote: >> Does the W3C now accept that HTML is not in practice an >> application of SGML? > > Why do you believe this to be important, Henri ? I think Henri is saying that because in the desktop browsers world, SGML is not the technology used for parsing HTML. There are implementations with different models attempting to parse HTML as it is not defined. So there are proposals to create an "HTML parsing model". What will be interesting to see if they all perl, python, C, Ruby, etc. libraries will follow this model once it is defined. It would be good I guess for the new WG to gather implementation experience, not only in desktop browsers but also in all applications consuming or producing HTML. >> Does the W3C now subscribe to the view that the engines that >> matter the most are Gecko, Presto, Trident and WebKit and if they >> interoperate, their common behavior is what gets specified? > > Is Internet Explorer based on any of these engines ? If > not, then the list needs to include IE's underlying engine. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_browsers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines_(HTML) Trident - Microsoft Gecko - Mozilla Foundation WebKit - Apple KHTML - KDE Project Presto - Opera iCab - iCab Though IMHO, layout engines are just one part of it. As I said above parsing libraries, indexing bots, authoring tools are as MUCH important, specifically if we want to stop the generation of tag soup. > In addition, if the role of the W3C is simply to to place > its seal of approval on what /is/, rather than on what > /should be/, then I for one would find that a very > disturbing (not to say depressing) state of affairs. Here come the consensus and the fact to deal with very different kind of opinions. I have read in many occasions exactly the opposite. I'm not taking position here. I'm just stating that there are different expressed opinions. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 30 October 2006 01:04:51 UTC