Le 14 nov. 2006 à 06:46, Jonathan Worent a écrit : >> XHTML 2.0 isn't exactly compatible with XHTML 1.x, so it would >> require >> major changes in the browser either way. >> > If its not compatible why the heck doe it share its namespace. I > know this has been brought up > before but I'm still confused. As of today, it doesn't http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/conformance.html#strict xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/" It is though an open issue. I think it would be wrong to share the same namespace from a QA point of view, but I'm not the WG. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Monday, 13 November 2006 22:24:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 30 April 2020 16:21:01 UTC