- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:24:35 +0900
- To: Jonathan Worent <jworent@yahoo.com>
- Cc: HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>
Le 14 nov. 2006 à 06:46, Jonathan Worent a écrit : >> XHTML 2.0 isn't exactly compatible with XHTML 1.x, so it would >> require >> major changes in the browser either way. >> > If its not compatible why the heck doe it share its namespace. I > know this has been brought up > before but I'm still confused. As of today, it doesn't http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/conformance.html#strict xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/" It is though an open issue. I think it would be wrong to share the same namespace from a QA point of view, but I'm not the WG. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 13 November 2006 22:24:53 UTC