- From: Jonathan Worent <jworent@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:46:39 -0800 (PST)
- To: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Cc: HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>
--- David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 08:38:44AM -0500, Jasper Magick wrote: > > With Microsoft's decision not to support application/xhtml+xml (even > > after promising they would, those fools) > > When did they promise that? The only mention I've seen of XHTML from > Microsoft has been a note that they wouldn't be supporting it in IE7 > (and that was many months ago). > > > will XHTML 2.0 be harder to "promote". > > Not really. > > XHTML 2.0 isn't exactly compatible with XHTML 1.x, so it would require > major changes in the browser either way. > If its not compatible why the heck doe it share its namespace. I know this has been brought up before but I'm still confused. > > Not supporting XHTML 1.0 at this time might even be an advantage for > Microsoft as it may allow them to develop a strategy for dealing with > XHTML 1.x and 2.0 without having to be backwards compatible with > whatever methods they would have used for 1.x. > > -- > David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com
Received on Monday, 13 November 2006 21:46:49 UTC