- From: Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:48:17 +0100
- To: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- CC: www-html@w3.org
Orion Adrian wrote: >>> My experience is its only natural for the author to specify behaviour and >>> using whatever hacks work with current popular browsers. >>> >> That's why I'm proposing a way for the author to specify *intent*, and >> signal that a given behavior is wise. >> > > Intent without reasoning doesn't really help. Since the user cannot > specify alternate behavior with any meaningful logic. > > Better would be rel="external site"; rel="alternate media"; or some > other meaningful values that would allow the user through the UA to > produce meaningful logic (e.g. if it's a link to another site, keep it > in the window; if it's an enlarged version of the same content, open > in a popup). > > And as a general rule, you should never show intent to the UA. Just > give it raw data (like where it's linking to or what class of data > it's linking to) and let the UA decide. Yes, maybe a @rel value is a better way to give information of how the link target fits with the content flow. Daniel
Received on Monday, 27 February 2006 12:47:54 UTC