- From: Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 21:37:11 +0100
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- CC: www-html@w3.org
David Woolley wrote: >> Has there been any talk of adding a @show attribute, similar to the one >> defined by XLink[1] (maybe only with "new" and "replace" as accepted >> > That sound behavioural, and therefore inappropriate for HTML. I'm not saying that we should necessarily call it @show > I'm not sure if rel and rev are still in XHTML 2.0, but it seems to me that these > existing attributes should be able to encode the necessary information, > although one might then need a style/behaviour sheet to specify which > relationships are close enough to justify replace Yes, that's a possibility. > (noting, though, that it is bad practice for authors to decide when the user gets a new window). > The author doesn't *decide* that a new window/tab gets opened, he merely signals that it might be wise for the client to do so, because the link breaks the flow of the page (i.e. a full sized version of an image shown in the document.) >> values), to the <a/> element? I think it is natural for the author of a >> document to specify whether a hyperlink target deviates from the flow of >> > My experience is its only natural for the author to specify behaviour and > using whatever hacks work with current popular browsers. That's why I'm proposing a way for the author to specify *intent*, and signal that a given behavior is wise. Cheers, Daniel
Received on Sunday, 26 February 2006 20:36:48 UTC