- From: Edward Lass <elass@goer.state.ny.us>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 15:57:29 -0400
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
>>> David Håsäther <hasather@gmail.com> 5/26/2005 3:36:08 PM >>> > > I'm not sure I agree using a definition list with only terms, and no > definitions makes sense, though. Can't think of any circumstances where > that would be appropriate, got any examples? How about an incomplete glossary? It could be wiki-based or on an individual page in progress. To say there's no definition--or at least not yet--one could leave the element out entirely. That seems preferable over "<dd/>" to me. - Ed.
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2005 19:57:30 UTC