- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 20:36:07 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
"Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com> wrote in message news:42954711.6010303@aptest.com... > However, those responses are almost always sent privately - not to these > forums. This process, and the way this Working Group handles public > comments, substantially predates the process documents to which Bjoern > refers. Could you please point me to the location of the archive of these responses? Issues which I may have agreed with, but not raised as they had previously been raised may actually be already addressed, it would useful to see the responses. > This can cause it to take much longer to respond to the issue, and can > also make it difficult to respond with specifics to individual > submissions - the resolutions become co-mingled. I am sure you can respond to each reviewer with a substantially identical response, even that is much better than no-response at all. If the above applies to any of my issues, can you please respond to me, as currently it appears I've just had no response at all, I do not want to suddenly have a Last Call, and find I'm having to re-raise and clarify issues that I thought were raised in a timely manner, but the WG felt had been addressed but never actually informed me. > To that end, I have subscribed to this discussion list, and will attempt > to participate actively as the XHTML 2 documents move forward. I find it very disappointing that you'd decided not to previously, despite the strong encouragement of the WG Charter. I am of course glad you're finally here though. Perhaps we might see issues addressed in quicker than 20 months now. Cheers, Jim.
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2005 19:39:05 UTC