Re: About XHTML 2.0

* Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl> [2005-05-21 15:13+0200]
> Dan Brickley wrote:
> >>>Perhaps <gap/> would work?
> >>
> >>Dropping it would work too. I still haven't seen any use cases that
> >> require this particular empty construct.
> >
> >Is there a nice CSS idiom for styling a <span/> or <div/> in an
> >HR-ish way?
> 
> Styling should never be considered a usecase for a semantic element.
 
Agreed. I guess I wasn't seeing much semantics, though Hixie's pointer 
to Steven's talk was helpful there. Thanks...

Dan

> However, I think you can use 'border' or perhaps '::after' in 
> combination with a line/three-dots/etc.-graphic.
> 
> 
> -- 
>  Anne van Kesteren
>  <http://annevankesteren.nl/>

Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 13:52:59 UTC