Re: About XHTML 2.0

Dan Brickley wrote:
>>> Perhaps <gap/> would work?
>> 
>> Dropping it would work too. I still haven't seen any use cases that
>>  require this particular empty construct.
> 
> Is there a nice CSS idiom for styling a <span/> or <div/> in an
> HR-ish way?

Styling should never be considered a usecase for a semantic element.

However, I think you can use 'border' or perhaps '::after' in 
combination with a line/three-dots/etc.-graphic.


-- 
  Anne van Kesteren
  <http://annevankesteren.nl/>

Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 13:13:07 UTC