- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 09:26:51 -0000
- To: www-html@w3.org
"David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:200503060842.j268g0R00413@djwhome.demon.co.uk... > >> proper language identification much thought, it seems the Working >> Group expects quite some change in the XHTML community. I do not see > > Whilst I certainly agree with you with respect to the current mass > market HTML authoring community, XHTML 2.0 is unlikely to be taken up > by the current HTML/XHTML 1.0 community as it is very much different from > the pseudo page description languages that they prefer. If the use cases of XHTML 2.0 are not web-pages created by Web Authors, what is it? I've previously always evaluated it against this use case by these users, and "XHTML 2 is a general-purpose markup language designed for representing documents for a wide range of purposes across the World Wide Web" seems to make it clear that, the current web-authors are exactly the audience. Jim.
Received on Sunday, 6 March 2005 09:28:40 UTC