- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 08:42:00 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
> proper language identification much thought, it seems the Working > Group expects quite some change in the XHTML community. I do not see Whilst I certainly agree with you with respect to the current mass market HTML authoring community, XHTML 2.0 is unlikely to be taken up by the current HTML/XHTML 1.0 community as it is very much different from the pseudo page description languages that they prefer. There is some risk of it being taken up for fashion/"looks good on CVs" reasons, but, in general, I think most people who use it will take semantics a lot more seriously than "web designers". (The main risk to quality is going to come from companies who insist on it for their own fashion reasons, especially if they use content management systems and don't train employees in XHTML itself.)
Received on Sunday, 6 March 2005 08:58:41 UTC