- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:48:59 -0400
- To: www-html-editor@w3.org
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Hi, We had a discussion on a French Web developer mailing-list [pompeurs][1] about dfn. The first comment was about the understanding of the definition in the specification. The second comment was about usability and to know if it was very useful. * Understanding DFN [[[ 9.4. The dfn element The dfn element contains the defining instance of the enclosed term. * Attributes The Common collection A collection of other attribute collections, including: Bi- directional, Core, Edit, Embedding, Events, Forms, Hypertext, I18N, Map, and Metainformation. * Example An <dfn id="def-acronym">acronym</dfn> is a word formed from the initial letters or groups of letters of words in a set phrase or series of words. ]]] - http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xhtml2-20050527/mod- text.html#edef_text_dfn Maybe the first sentence should be something like: The dfn element contains a word (or a group of words) being defined by one or more sentences. * Usability It may be good to give usability examples of this element. Why is it useful to use this element? 1. Human Usability. Defined once somewhere with an "id" (mandatory ?), the definition can be linked from another document, or another part of the text referring to this definition. It's human usability. Though someone could argue that: An <span id="def-acronym">acronym</span> is a word formed from the initial letters or groups of letters of words in a set phrase or series of words. is not a loss in usability at all. The dfn element having not direct benefits for the user. Even better someone could choose to do. Blah blah blah. <span id="def-acronym">An acronym is a word formed from the initial letters or groups of letters of words in a set phrase or series of words.</span> Blah blah blah. then it gives the same functionality for the user and it's easier to extract the _exact_ definition. 2. Machine Usability. Is dfn useful for a machine, a semantics analyzer agent or just a tool to create a list of definition, a glossary from one or a series of page. If we take the example given in XHTML 2.0 right now, I would be inclined to say no. An <span id="def-acronym">acronym</span> is a word formed from the initial letters or groups of letters of words in a set phrase or series of words. There's a missing element to be really useful. - A definition can be created by more than one sentence. <span clas="def">An <span id="def-acronym">acronym</span> is a word formed from the initial letters or groups of letters of words in a set phrase or series of words. Another sentence. Yet another sentence.</span> - A definition can be included in a more general paragraph. Some prose. <span clas="def">An <span id="def-acronym">acronym</span> is a word formed from the initial letters or groups of letters of words in a set phrase or series of words.</span> Some another prose. Without the span here, it's impossible for an agent to extract the definition and make a glossary. The user, for sure, could have the choice to do what I have just done, add span in the text. But that would be with a random definition of the class name or the way to do it. So I'm not sure if dfn element is useful being underspecified. I propose either - to drop it from the specification - to add an element making possible to use it for automatic purpose. [1]: http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/pompeurs/ -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2005 14:48:24 UTC