Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS

On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
>
> Well I'm d@mned.  Thank you, Ian, for pointing that out. When you say 
> "never been implemented", does this include works in progress such as 
> Mozilla, Opera, IE6+ and so on, and if so, is there any consistency in 
> how they interpret </> ?

I am aware of no plans to implement </>. I have not tested what browsers 
do with it (but eventually will have to, heh, when I write the "parsing" 
chapter of the "HTML5" spec...).

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2005 13:47:12 UTC