- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:58:18 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
> with empty", an illusory gain. xml:lang should therefore be required to > be non-empty, but then "mul" must be allowed for multilingual documents In which case it will end up defaulting to the authoring tools interface language, probably en-US, rather than null; is that really any better?
Received on Friday, 28 January 2005 07:58:21 UTC