Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute) from Trejkaz on 2005-01-21 (www-html@w3.org from January 2005)

From: Trejkaz <trejkaz@trypticon.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:56:47 +1100
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <200501212156.51799.trejkaz@trypticon.org>

On Friday 21 January 2005 21:48, you wrote:
> Trejkaz wrote:
> >>> Why not just rel="nopagerank"?
> >>
> >> Why don't they use a processing instruction?
> >
> > Or an attribute in a new and appropriate namespace... :-)
>
> Because there are no namespaces in HTML?

Hmm... true.  I forgot people still used that old thing.  Even XHTML 1.0 is 
getting a bit dusty.

TX

-- 
             Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <trejkaz@trypticon.org>
          Web site: http://xaoza.net/
         Jabber ID: trejkaz@jabber.zim.net.au
   GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F  A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73

Received on Friday, 21 January 2005 10:57:00 UTC