- From: David Dorward <david@us-lot.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:49:53 +0000
- To: www-html@w3.org
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:41:26AM +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Quoting David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>: >> (My perception here is that Ann was expressing the false argument for >> XHTML that making all tags non-optional produces a better defined parse >> tree; which basically fails to realise that the tags are implied, even >> though not physically present.) > I'm not sure how tags can ever be implied in XHTML. They can't. That is the main difference between HTML and XHTML. The point is that XHTML does not create a better defined parse tree because of this. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2005 10:50:41 UTC