- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:41:26 +0100
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Quoting David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>: > (My perception here is that Ann was expressing the false argument for > XHTML that making all tags non-optional produces a better defined parse > tree; which basically fails to realise that the tags are implied, even > though not physically present.) It's Anne. I'm not sure how tags can ever be implied in XHTML. (Not talking about the text/html serialization here.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2005 10:41:52 UTC