- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 07:38:36 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
> > > There are various opinions on this topic; me, myself and I all would > happily add xlink:type="simple" if, in return, we'd get > xlink:type="extended" and external linkbases. If, in return, we'd use > standards in XHTML, rather than home-brew proprietary solutions; the My impression is that, in the market for which HTML was originally intended, people are voting with their feet for simpler linking constructs, in particular [[xxxxx]] and [http://yyyy xxxxx] in Wiki language (which uses HTML largely presentationally to achieve relatively semantic documents). There are probably similar examples in BBS type applications.
Received on Saturday, 10 December 2005 00:20:14 UTC