- From: Kelly Miller <lightsolphoenix@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:10:43 -0500
- To: Oskar Welzl <lists@welzl.info>
- CC: Devin Bayer <devin@freeshell.org>, Jeremy Rand <jeremy@asofok.org>, www-html@w3.org
XLink as it is right now would be very bad for XHTML. I seriously doubt page authors will want to have to declare a simple link EVERY SINGLE TIME they want to have a link. Oskar Welzl wrote: >Shall we try one more "XLink in XHTML 2.0"? >Count my vote. - But I'm afraid I'm too late. Again. :-( > > -- http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ - Get Firefox! http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ - Reclaim Your Inbox! Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2005 23:10:58 UTC