- From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 15:11:34 -0400
- To: www-html@w3.org
On 8/4/05, acc10-2005-67@gmx.de <acc10-2005-67@gmx.de> wrote: > > Orion Adrian wrote: > > > The only things that should be marked up > > are those things that a computer cannot > > do itself. > > Ok, but thats why the marking of notions and compound break points is an > issue for the coder. > > How should a machine know on its own the notion structure of a text or the > compounds? I know that their is a lot of research in artifical inteligence > but I do not expect my machine to get in touch with it soon ;-). In fact > only the comound break point analysis could be done automatically, but only > by checking the text against highly qualified dictionaries and I do not see > this as an appropriate solution, when you can store this information in the > document itself. > > Maybe my suggestion was missunderstood. By no way I long for marking up all > and every notion in a text, but only those considred by the author as to be > of relevance for e.g. indexing or to get an idea of the documents content > (of interest for more structured web search). So far, maybe <nfi> (notion > for index) or <nor> (notion of relevance) instead of <n> (preferred because > of length) would have been clearer suggestions, maybe my English wasn't good > enough to transport my idea. In Germany we know "Schlagwort" or "Stichwort" > but there seems to be no equivalent English word in my dictionary. > > If interested in an example, please scroll down. > > Of course no one should be "forced" to use notion if not interested in > adding this semantic information (means <n> should be an optional tag), just > the same way no one is forced to indicate all abbreviations used with <abbr> > if their is no benefit from it. > > Do you remember printed literature? It had such indexes in the appendix. And > I consider them a good approach for the web as well, between the both > extremes "site/document search" and "sitemap/table of content". > > ----------------- > > An example to demonstrate potential use of a <n> tag: > > Text copied and pasted from > http://www.pitt.edu/~heinisch/ca_germ.html > Author: Patricia Dinsmore > > <p> > The Germans have traditionally regarded their model as "<n>Sonderweg</n>", > that is a middle of the road approach between free <n>market liberalism</n> > and <n>state-centered socialism</n>. The <n>welfare system</n> is an > integrated part of Germany's "<n>social market economy</n>." Particularly > significant is the fact that in Germany, more than in most countries, > welfare policies have been mechanisms of <n>economic governance</n>. That is > welfare policies are designed to enhance <n>employment effects</n> by > withdrawing <n>surplus labor</n> from the economy. In short, early > retirement schemes or long university programs serve to constrain the supply > of labor when unemployment rates are high. This has prompted critics to > charge that Germany has the oldest students, youngest retirees and longest > vacationing workers in the world. > </p> > > With a dedicated user agent or server side processing this could result in > an alphabetical index like: > > - economic governance > - economy, social market > - effects, employment > - employment effects > - governance, economic > - labor, surplus > - liberalism, market > - market economy, social > - market liberalism > - socialism, state-centered > - social market economy > - Sonderweg > - state-centered socialism > - surplus labor > - system, welfare > - welfare system What you're looking for it something to mark up text as important. Keyword would probably be a more accurate term and I believe it's already been brought up and it's something I already support. I got confused by the term notion which doesn't represent what you're talking about here. Orion Adrian -- Orion Adrian
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2005 19:11:38 UTC