- From: <acc10-2005-67@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 20:33:50 +0200 (MEST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Orion Adrian wrote: > The only things that should be marked up > are those things that a computer cannot > do itself. Ok, but thats why the marking of notions and compound break points is an issue for the coder. How should a machine know on its own the notion structure of a text or the compounds? I know that their is a lot of research in artifical inteligence but I do not expect my machine to get in touch with it soon ;-). In fact only the comound break point analysis could be done automatically, but only by checking the text against highly qualified dictionaries and I do not see this as an appropriate solution, when you can store this information in the document itself. Maybe my suggestion was missunderstood. By no way I long for marking up all and every notion in a text, but only those considred by the author as to be of relevance for e.g. indexing or to get an idea of the documents content (of interest for more structured web search). So far, maybe <nfi> (notion for index) or <nor> (notion of relevance) instead of <n> (preferred because of length) would have been clearer suggestions, maybe my English wasn't good enough to transport my idea. In Germany we know "Schlagwort" or "Stichwort" but there seems to be no equivalent English word in my dictionary. If interested in an example, please scroll down. Of course no one should be "forced" to use notion if not interested in adding this semantic information (means <n> should be an optional tag), just the same way no one is forced to indicate all abbreviations used with <abbr> if their is no benefit from it. Do you remember printed literature? It had such indexes in the appendix. And I consider them a good approach for the web as well, between the both extremes "site/document search" and "sitemap/table of content". ----------------- An example to demonstrate potential use of a <n> tag: Text copied and pasted from http://www.pitt.edu/~heinisch/ca_germ.html Author: Patricia Dinsmore <p> The Germans have traditionally regarded their model as "<n>Sonderweg</n>", that is a middle of the road approach between free <n>market liberalism</n> and <n>state-centered socialism</n>. The <n>welfare system</n> is an integrated part of Germany's "<n>social market economy</n>." Particularly significant is the fact that in Germany, more than in most countries, welfare policies have been mechanisms of <n>economic governance</n>. That is welfare policies are designed to enhance <n>employment effects</n> by withdrawing <n>surplus labor</n> from the economy. In short, early retirement schemes or long university programs serve to constrain the supply of labor when unemployment rates are high. This has prompted critics to charge that Germany has the oldest students, youngest retirees and longest vacationing workers in the world. </p> With a dedicated user agent or server side processing this could result in an alphabetical index like: - economic governance - economy, social market - effects, employment - employment effects - governance, economic - labor, surplus - liberalism, market - market economy, social - market liberalism - socialism, state-centered - social market economy - Sonderweg - state-centered socialism - surplus labor - system, welfare - welfare system
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2005 18:40:37 UTC