- From: symbulos partners <partners@symbulos.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 12:23:26 +0000
- To: www-html@w3.org
On Wednesday 30 Mar 2005 19:37, Barry wrote: > The checked="checked" thing bothers me too. It's sloppy, and I don't care > what wasn't considered in advance. It seems easy to fix. If any of the > arguments to the contrary are valid, they went over my head, or maybe I > didn't read them carefully enough. We also find it extremely annoying. I read the arguments. I agree on the importance of historical origins, but we are not talking about an ancient painting. These languages are only an agreed standard of communication. They have, XTHML has, above all, the scope to work seamlessly, in my opinion. The checked="checked" behaviour, together with the select="selected" behaviour, does not allow it to work seamlessly. It is not at all a specific problem with templating engines. It is foremostly a problem with logic. The behaviour is not very logical, in my opinion. Even from a technological point of view, it is not only a problem of templating engines. It is a problem for people who code as well. You have to introduce special subroutines for generating the proper code, with higher probability of error, which induces higher risk of non compliancy. Furthermore, there is performance reduction, which affects not only the single application but the net as a whole. Finally, the code you have to write is clumsy, ineffective, largely spoiling the (potential) elegance of XHTML. It seems easy to fix. -- symbulos partners -.- symbulos - ethical services for your organisation http://www.symbulos.com
Received on Saturday, 2 April 2005 00:31:07 UTC