- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:18:47 -0700
- To: <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
> I really wish you would read all relevant specifications before > posting to these mailing lists. This has already been suggested, and is > listed almost exactly like that in the XHTML 2.0 draft... Idea is quite obvious, that is why I asked: > > Does anybody know any previous discussions about this? > .... , except it uses <nl> instead of <ul>. <nl> is from another opera I guess. <nl> is a hierarchical list as far as I can see it. I was speaking about href and arbitrary HTML element though. As Bjoern Hoehrmann (thanks a lot!) mentioned about hrefs in XHTML 2.0 my queistion already got a clear answer. > Try the "nesting and the newly promiscuous href" thread [1] from last > december, or search the archives for others. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2003Dec/0076.html I appreciate you a lot, Lachlan, for the link. This is what I really needed. Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Sunday, 4 July 2004 23:19:15 UTC