- From: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 14:53:04 +0900 (JST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
fantasai <fantasai@escape.com> wrote: > > Improving the 'cite' attribute usage might be an another option. > > The 'cite' attribute can't present human-readable attributions. > Also, because it's restrained to URI values, it can only present > attributions that can be represented by a URI, a very limited > subset of common usage. > > See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2003Mar/0157.html Of course I'm aware of the previous discussion, that's why I pointed out that the other side of the argument exists. I didn't see clear consensus last time, and the WG hasn't decided either way yet, so both arguments remain to be considered. And the Semantic Web folks may have different view on what can be represented by a URI. Regards, -- Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org W3C - World Wide Web Consortium
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 01:53:06 UTC