- From: Wingnut <wingnut@winternet.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 15:29:12 -0500
- To: Mikko Rantalainen <mira@cc.jyu.fi>, www-html@w3.org
Mikko Rantalainen wrote: > <snip> > In addition (again IIRC), there wasn't a single real-world example where > the style attribute would have been needed [1]. All the examples given > were a direct result of silly authoring methods. If XHTML targets to be > a yet another presentational markup language, then we should include the > style attribute, otherwise not. The style attribute is the only current method of handing-around author-preferred stylings WITH the node (element)... when a node is "gleaned" for transclusion purposes. Please see... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2003Jan/0201.html And maybe all of this thread... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2003Mar/0030.html <snip> Best! Wingnut
Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 16:37:10 UTC