Re: Key/Item data

John Lewis wrote:
[snip]

> dl/dt/dd are good names. You haven't provided me with a good reason
> why we need new names, or why dl/dt/dd are bad names. (You say the
> benefits of good names are "widely accepted," but you don't list any.
> You also haven't explained why dl/dt/dd are bad names--unless being
> unintuitive means bad.) 

That is exactly the point : unintuitive means "bad".  Period.
Philip Taylor, RHBNC

Received on Monday, 17 March 2003 16:44:36 UTC