- From: Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 21:45:33 +0000
- To: John Lewis <lewi0371@mrs.umn.edu>
- CC: www-html@w3.org
John Lewis wrote: [snip] > dl/dt/dd are good names. You haven't provided me with a good reason > why we need new names, or why dl/dt/dd are bad names. (You say the > benefits of good names are "widely accepted," but you don't list any. > You also haven't explained why dl/dt/dd are bad names--unless being > unintuitive means bad.) That is exactly the point : unintuitive means "bad". Period. Philip Taylor, RHBNC
Received on Monday, 17 March 2003 16:44:36 UTC