- From: Toby A Inkster <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:42:17 +0000
- To: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
- Cc: "www-html@w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20030312184217.GC5620@ophelia.goddamn.co.uk>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:45:21AM +0100, Daniel Glazman wrote: | 1. it is possible to traverse a document's tree using the DOM without | having to traverse all attributes. That's the point of parentNode, | firstChild, lastChild, nextSibling and previousSibling. | 2. the DOM is not attribute-oriented. To look for all elements carrying | a given attribute, you have to traverse the elements' tree and then | check for attribute presence for every element. DOM != XML. | 4. unless you work in a source environment, and unless you can use a | style language having attribute selectors, attributes are not meant | to be presented to the reader and have no influence on the rendering. Try explaining to a Lynx user that the "alt" attribute of the <img/> element is not meant to be presented to them and has no influence on its rendering. Try explaining to the user of a graphical browser that the "height" and "width" attributes of the <img/> element have no influence on its rendering. | </Daniel> You missed your opening <Daniel> tag. -- Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS | mailto:tobyink@goddamn.co.uk | pgp:0x6A2A7D39 aim:inka80 | icq:6622880 | yahoo:tobyink | jabber:tobyink@a-message.de http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/ | "You've got spam!" playing://(nothing)
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2003 13:42:26 UTC