- From: Toby A Inkster <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:51:52 +0000
- To: Wingnut <wingnut@winternet.com>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20030306185152.GA26880@ophelia.goddamn.co.uk>
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 09:38:03AM -0600, Wingnut wrote:
| A good content provider ALWAYS writes nodes that are ready for
| transcluding. For me, right now, that would be nodes with embeded style
| attributes.
Transclusion of content, doesn't necessarily equal transclusion of style
though. Indeed, translusion of style may be a bad thing.
For example, document 1 has blue underlined links and large black
headings (as is common on the web), document 2 has green italic links and
blue underlined headings (all text in document 2 is the same size for
whatever reason)
If we translude parts of document 2 into document 1 and keep the styling
of document 2 for those parts, its headings will appear to be links to the
casual reader of document 1.
However, with no styling information included inline, the portions of
document 2 transcluded will take on the appearance of document 1, so will
be less confusing to the reader.
The author of document 2 may be dismayed. Green italics might be a turn on
for him, or maybe they have sentimental value, or maybe he likes them for
some other bizarre reason. However, the readers will be happy, as they
will be reading a consistant document.
And it is more important for the readers to be happy, because there are
more of them.
--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS | mailto:tobyink@goddamn.co.uk | pgp:0x6A2A7D39
aim:inka80 | icq:6622880 | yahoo:tobyink | jabber:tobyink@a-message.de
http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/ | "You've got spam!"
playing://(nothing)
Received on Thursday, 6 March 2003 13:53:39 UTC