- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 07:35:01 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
> Agreed. If the spec is more specific, maybe people will be less reluctant to > use ALT and TITLE correctly. As it stands now, you can argue that IE is just Only a very small proportion of the people writing web pages have ever seen the specification, and even less of the people who specify that there must be tooltips and they must work on Netscape 4. (Most web sites are specified in terms of a visual appearence, to be achieved on popular software, not in the terms that HTML would like them specified; HTML is merely a means of driving IE.) It's generally true in the computing industry (and probably other technical industries) that people don't read source documents. Historically, this has been because they have been expensive and not available through the normal book trade, or even through software suppliers, but another problem is that they are written in technical and precise language that scares people, and they prefer the popularised versions from their book stall; increasingly they also prefer ones from which they can simply copy examples without understanding them in detail. A lot of web coding techniques are actually propagated simply by copying bits of other people's web pages. So, improviing the specification will mainly only get the message through to the already converted.
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 02:51:11 UTC