- From: Annala Raino EC <Raino.Annala@elisa.fi>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 13:36:31 +0300
- To: "Toby A Inkster" <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
Ok, thanks for the input guys. >Well yes, particularly as these links might not just appear in XHTML, >but also in other places, such as databases, spreadsheets, browser >bookmarks, e-mails, etc: it makes sense to do this sort of thing in >the URI instead of the markup. That's a good point. I can understand your reasoning there. However I'm still wondering whether wording and my illustrative examples drew the discussion to this direction. Now as an after thought the URI-based solution just seems too obvious. I guess I was thinking it might be easier to get support for these features on browsers if there were amendments to the markup also. Oh well, back to the drawing board. >I believe that filesharing program eDonkey has already defined a URI >scheme. Gnutella also has a URN-based URI scheme, which I think is kind >of a nifty way of doing things. Interesting. I have understood that eDonkey is one of predominant protocols at the moment, so it will definately be worth a check. thanks. Raino
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2003 06:39:21 UTC