- From: Toby A Inkster <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:05:51 +0100
- To: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20030616070551.GF22124@ophelia.goddamn.co.uk>
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 08:44:56AM +0200, Jens Meiert wrote: | Why keep some only-formatting elements like <code />, <kbd />, <tt /> (maybe | some of them were thrown away, I am not sure), when CSS offers a much better | implementation? <code /> and <kbd /> are not formatting elements. <code /> is used to mark up a span of computer code. <kbd /> is used to mark up computer input (for example: Press <kbd>Ctrl</kbd>+<kbd>A</kbd>.) <tt /> has already been removed (AFAIK). | Why even introduce elements like <l /> instead of referring | completely to CSS, CSS is a separate technology. There are browsers that don't support CSS and I certain CSS agents that don't support XHTML. | e.g. by engaging every developer to use a 'display: | block;' property to paragraphs (although there are even possibilities to | get rid of <p />, too)? CSS is powerful enough. I'm not entirely sure you understand what XHTML is for... -- Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS | mailto:tobyink@goddamn.co.uk | pgp:0x6A2A7D39 aim:inka80 | icq:6622880 | yahoo:tobyink | jabber:tai@jabber.linux.it http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/ | "You've got spam!" playing://(nothing)
Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 03:05:58 UTC