- From: Jason M. Kikta <kiktajm@muohio.edu>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 03:33:43 -0400
- To: www-html@w3.org
That seems only logical. After all, there's already a different MIME type, right? If W3C is already recommending that XHTML pages be served as "application/xhtml+xml" versus "text/html", then changing the tag to <xhtml> is only logical. Jason Arthur Wiebe wrote: > > I propose that since XHTML is XHTML not HTML, that we change the <html> > element to something that would make more sense. I'm not saying that > <html> is hard to understand but it doesn't make sense to have an <html> > parent element when it's not an HTML page but is an XHTML page. > Why not change it to something like <xhtml>? Or if someone can't stand > that extra letter then we could also change it to <root>? > This has been on my mind ever since a guy asked me why I was using the > <html> tag when it's an XHTML page. > <Arthur/> > >
Received on Sunday, 15 June 2003 03:34:55 UTC