- From: Arthur Wiebe <webmaster@awiebe.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 08:46:52 -0400
- To: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>, www-html@w3.org
Jens Meiert wrote: >As I looked over the XHTML draft, I thought about a more generic CSS >integration similar to the Ruby module. So, what about referring to (internal) CSS >via > > ><css> > <!-- add styles here --> ></css> > > >and, related to external CSS, via > > ><css href="URI" /> > > >I guess this is really self-descriptive and you even don't need to announce >the type attribute (text/css). Please tell me, if I overlooked something >important; nevertheless, what do you mean? > > > > Jens Meiert. > > > > What's wrong with the style element? I have always wondered why the link element was used for stylesheets, but I can't agree with your proposal since the style element can do what you've just showed there. I've thought about adding a src attribute to style but that wouldn't be any better than link. Unless we could use <style src="/style.css" type="text/css" />. But for alternate and all those other values, I don't know. I think we should stick with link for now unless someone can think of something better. <Arthur/>
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2003 08:47:06 UTC