- From: kelvSYC <kelvsyc@shaw.ca>
- Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 17:32:37 -0700
- To: W3 HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>
While looking at the H1 debate I can't help to think of <section>... <section> <h>1</h> <section> <h>2</h> </section> <section> <h>3</h> </section> </section> I ask this: do you consider the section marked with 1 as its header as a first- or second-level section, and would it change if I wrapped <body> around it (since <body> is virtually synonymous with a <section> element under a different name)? To solve this mystery, let's propose the following for XHTML 2.0: Simply remove <title>. Now, some of you might think the idea is absurd, but I add that, seeing that <body> is a giant <section>, and that every document body virtually needs some kind of header, the function of <title> should be transferred to that of <h> inside </body>. That is, this would be equivalent: (What we have now) <head> <title>...</title> ... </head> <body> ... </body> (What I propose) <head> ... </head> <body> <h>...</h> </body> And just like in older implementations, if no first-generation <h> descendant of <body> is found, then the title is implied by the URI.
Received on Saturday, 15 February 2003 19:32:39 UTC