- From: Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design <nigel@miswebdesign.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:53:50 -0000
- To: "Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
As in the relation between the title and h1? I would argue that they should be semantically the same or near enough, in which case a document with two sections should use h2 for the sections and h1 to describe the entire document. > -----Original Message----- > From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf > Of Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] > Sent: 12 February 2003 21:47 > To: Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design > Cc: www-html@w3.org > Subject: Re: H1 > > > > I would argue not if you regard H1 <> Title ... > ** Phil. > -------- > Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design wrote: > > > > In that case should it not be given a single <h1> with <h2>s for the 2 > > sections? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] [mailto:P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk] > > > Sent: 12 February 2003 21:43 > > > To: Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design > > > Cc: www-html@w3.org > > > Subject: Re: H1 > > > > > > > > > Yes, if the sections are sufficiently short (and closely > > > related) to justify having two or more sections on a single > > > web page ... > > > > > > Philip Taylor, RHBNC > > > -------- > > > Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design wrote: > > > > > > > > Is there ever a situation where a document should/could have > > > more than one > > > > H1 element, I would say there isn't. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Nigel > > > > > > > > MIS Web Design > > > > http://www.miswebdesign.com/ >
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 16:53:45 UTC