- From: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 15:55:21 +0900 (JST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
"Ernest Cline" <ernestcline@mindspring.com> wrote: > > "Unicode in XML and other Markup Languages" Note classifies those > > characters as "characters not suitable for use with markup" [1]. > > It is quite unlikely that XHTML 2.0 would advocate such usage > > against this guideline. > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/unicode-xml/#Line > > I wasn't aware of the TR, but having read it, I only agree with it in > part. The only reason that these characters are not recommended is > because of the existance of paragraph and line markup in (X)HTML. No. The guideline here is essentially "use markup rather than those separator characters", and (X)HTML is merely an example. The principle still holds for other markup languages, such as XHTML 2.0. If you don't agree, you'd better argue with the Unicode Technical Committee and the W3C Internationalization Working Group why this guideline is inappropriate, and this list is not an appropriate place for that discussion. > If there > were no earlier (X)HTML standards, I think that separator model would > be clearly the superior. Back to 10+ years ago, <p> was an empty paragraph separator in HTML. It was changed to a container element in HTML 2.0. Your argument sounds like a step backwards. Regards, -- Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org W3C - World Wide Web Consortium
Received on Monday, 7 April 2003 02:55:23 UTC