- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 08:47:49 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
> 2.0 quite so quickly, though. To my mind it seems rather strict and perhaps > not ideal for creating rich web content. Nevertheless, I agree with Tantek I don't think it was ever intended to be used for rich content. If you mean graphically rich, it definitely isn't. If you mean structurally rich, it is intended to be simple; for structurally rich material, you must either mix several namespaces, or use an XML application, like docbook, intended for more sophisticated users.
Received on Sunday, 6 April 2003 03:47:53 UTC