- From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <schnitz@mozquito.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 15:17:27 +0200
- To: "Ann Navarro" <ann@webgeek.com>, "MAISONNY Benoit" <Benoit.MAISONNY@eurocontrol.int>, <www-html@w3.org>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Ann - I agree, and thanks for correcting me. "Trick" is the wrong word, I didn't want to imply that it is illegal - just using the full DTD methodology, as you said. The problem is indeed with MSXML and has been known for a while. - Sebastian -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Ann Navarro Gesendet: Fr 28.06.2002 15:00 An: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer; MAISONNY Benoit; www-html@w3.org; xml-dev@lists.xml.org Cc: Betreff: Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML At 02:24 PM 6/28/2002 +0200, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer wrote: >Perhaps the ongoing work on M12N in XML Schema may >solve this problem once for all in the future, since the HTML >WG had to do a lot of tricks with DTDs to make the M12N >happen in the first place. They weren't "tricks", though no one is claiming that they aren't are complicated DTDs. Heavily parameterized DTDs are legal, and should (and can be) parsed appropriately by a robust parser. The issue is MSXML, issues that have been repeatedly brought to Microsoft's attention, and so far are not forthcoming with corrections. Ann Navarro, WebGeek Inc. http://www.webgeek.com/ What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Received on Friday, 28 June 2002 09:17:58 UTC