- From: Lachlan Cannon <luminosity@members.evolt.org>
- Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 23:16:50 +1000
- To: www-html@w3.org
Kai Lahmann wrote: > > hi > if you watch how <meta>-Tags are (miss) used, I'm not sure, if they > shouldn't be repoved from the HTML standard. They aren't read by any > search engine (because they are _only_ miss-used), they have in most > cases (always?) nothing to do with the content - everybody knows all > this games about "how to get many hits with good <meta>s".. Currently > they only exist to make the files bigegr and for the authors to think > they are cool. > Is there any remaining practical use of <meta>? > For detailing metadata? Without the ability currently to embed RDF data into a document, meta is vitally important. In addition, although it may not be used now for many things that doesn't mean it won't be. And it being there isn't hurting or breaking anything. -- Lach web: http://illuminosity.net/ e-mail: lach @ illuminosity.net msn: luminosity @ members.evolt.org
Received on Saturday, 24 August 2002 09:20:34 UTC