- From: kelvSYC <kelvsyc@shaw.ca>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:22:26 -0600
- To: W3 HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>
> While everyone is wantonly suggesting elements like: > <summary> > <abstract> > <notice> > <cite> > <pub> > <author> > <quote> > <Title> > <conclusion> > <info> > <warning> > <section> > I thought I'd jump on the bandwagon. How about: > <sentence> > <word> > <character> ...uh, how about <stroke> as the allowed content of <character>? > Seriously though, can't anyone see the trap we are falling into? I don't see > why the <span class="..."> can't be used to cover pretty much all of these > scenarios. Me neither. If you really want those tags above (isn't <cite>, <quote>, and <section> already in XHTML?), I'd say you import your own tags from your own namespace. Or make up your own module.
Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 22:23:18 UTC