Re: [Re: Indicating browser support for XHTML1.0]

AndrewWatt2001@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 22/11/01 12:10:47 GMT Standard Time, aclover@1value.com 
> writes:
> 
> 
> > Yes, and don't use the <tagname /> shorthand for elements 
> > which are not defined as empty elements in HTML. <script /> 
> > is one example likely to go disastrously wrong!
> 
> What would be the purpose of having an empty <script /> tag?
> 
> Andrew Watt

<script src="/scripts/myscript.js" type="text/javascript" />

No point in having a closing tag is this example.



--
Brian Kavanaugh
Web Programmer
Clarke Lanzen Skalla Investment Firm, Inc.
14747 California St.
Omaha NE 68154
493-3313 x7155 / (800) 635-3427 x7155
briank@clsinvest.com (work)
bkavanaugh@usa.net   (home)

Received on Thursday, 22 November 2001 10:13:35 UTC