Re: Indicating browser support for XHTML1.0 from AndrewWatt2001@aol.com on 2001-11-22 (www-html@w3.org from November 2001)

From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:02:17 EST
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <8e.1e7c7fe3.292e6d79@aol.com>

In a message dated 22/11/01 12:10:47 GMT Standard Time, aclover@1value.com 
writes:

> Yes, and don't use the <tagname /> shorthand for elements 
> which are not defined as empty elements in HTML. <script /> 
> is one example likely to go disastrously wrong!

What would be the purpose of having an empty <script /> tag?

Andrew Watt

Received on Thursday, 22 November 2001 10:02:21 UTC