- From: Peter Foti (PeterF) <PeterF@SystolicNetworks.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:09:07 -0500
- To: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
The XHTML 1.0 Recommendation (http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#docconf) states: <quote> Here is an example of a minimal XHTML document. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <head> <title>Virtual Library</title> </head> <body> <p>Moved to <a href="http://vlib.org/">vlib.org</a>.</p> </body> </html> Note that in this example, the XML declaration is included. An XML declaration like the one above is not required in all XML documents. XHTML document authors are strongly encouraged to use XML declarations in all their documents. Such a declaration is required when the character encoding of the document is other than the default UTF-8 or UTF-16. </quote> I have 2 comments. 1. This says it's an example of a "minimal XHTML document". That is not true, because a "minimal" XHTML document does not require the XML declaration. Nor does it require a <p> or <a> tag. I think the work "minimal" should be removed from this statement. 2. I have found that including the XML declaration on the first line causes pages to not be rendered as HTML in some browsers, including (but not limited to) IE 5.5 for Mac. Would you call this "breaking backwards compatability"? Peter Foti Systolic Networks Phone: (603) 870-8170 Fax: (603) 870-8170
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2001 15:06:58 UTC